From: tomucko@yahoo.com (Tom Ucko)
Subject: Re: Spartacus etc.on Time Warner
Received on Mon Feb 8 11:28:56 2010.
I've been watching Spartacus hoping it would grab me. I think it looks chea=
p and silly visually and the slow-mo gore makes me laugh at times. Sam Peck=
inpah did that so much better. I do kind of like that the character of Spar=
tacus is being given room to grow as the series moves along, but overall th=
e series has been a disappointment for me so far. Starz must like the show =
though because they renewed it for a second season before the first episode=
aired.
--- On Mon, 2/8/10, Jeff Bernstein wrote:
From: Jeff Bernstein
Subject: Re: [iddiots] Spartacus etc.on Time Warner
To: iddiots@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, February 8, 2010, 11:00 AM
=20=20=20=20=20=20
Maybe they're removing them so quickly because the ratings aren't goo=
d?=A0 I never turn anything off in the middle, but after looking forward to=
the series, we turned it off halfway through the premiere because we found=
it so simplistic and boring.=A0 If it's been better since then, please let=
me know.
Jeff
On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Nora Lee Mandel wrote:
I've learned my lesson so I'm watching "Spartacus"
live, as it were, so I won't be writing to Time Warner about the continuing
Starz On Demand problem.=A0 But for any of you Time Warner customers who wa=
nt to
watch this violent-as-300/ sexy as Showtime series look at ancient Rome (I =
hadn't thought of
slaves as fluffers before), don't wait to see it On Demand. 3 weeks in and
already Time Warner has dropped the 2nd episode from the on Demand
menu.=A0 Starz was repeating the earlier episodes during the week so catch =
them
then, or you'll have to wait for the DVD. =A0Or you can write Time Warner a=
nd
complain.